How does your Inventory Costing Method effect Cash Flow?
- matthewgregory727
- Jul 25, 2023
- 4 min read
During times of rising material costs, the FIFO (First-In, First-Out) inventory costing method can lead to the understatement of the cost of sales, which can create a cash crunch for a company. Here's how it happens:
1. FIFO Method: Under the FIFO method, it is assumed that the first inventory items purchased or produced are the first ones sold. In other words, the cost of goods sold (COGS) is calculated using the cost of the oldest inventory, while the ending inventory reflects the cost of the most recent purchases.
2. Rising Material Costs: When material costs are increasing, the cost of the most recent inventory purchases is higher than the cost of the older inventory items. This means that the COGS calculated using the older, lower-cost inventory does not accurately reflect the current market value of the goods sold.
3. Understatement of Cost of Sales: As a result of using the FIFO method, the cost of sales is understated because it does not fully capture the increased cost of materials. The lower cost of goods sold on the income statement can make the company's profitability appear higher than it actually is.
4. Cash Crunch: The understatement of the cost of sales leads to higher gross profit and net income figures on the income statement. However, since the cost of sales is understated, the cash paid to acquire the higher-priced inventory is not fully reflected in the expenses. This creates a cash crunch because the company has to pay higher prices for materials but does not receive enough cash from the sales to cover these increased costs.
In essence, the FIFO method assumes that the oldest and cheapest inventory is sold first, which doesn't accurately reflect the current market conditions during periods of rising material costs. As a result, the company's cash flow may be insufficient to cover the higher expenses associated with acquiring inventory, leading to a cash crunch.
In times of rising material costs, the LIFO (Last-In, First-Out) method may provide a more accurate depiction of the cost of sales compared to other inventory valuation methods, such as FIFO (First-In, First-Out). This is because LIFO assumes that the most recently purchased or produced inventory is sold first, aligning the cost of goods sold (COGS) with the current higher prices of materials. As a result, LIFO can reflect the inflationary effect of rising material costs on the cost of sales.
However, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States does not allow LIFO inventory valuation without further scrutiny for a few reasons:
1. Complexity: LIFO can be more complex to implement and track than FIFO or other inventory valuation methods. It requires detailed record-keeping and regular inventory adjustments, which can be burdensome for some businesses.
2. Inflationary Effect: LIFO's ability to reflect inflationary effects can reduce taxable income by matching higher costs with revenue. The IRS scrutinizes LIFO because it believes that LIFO's inflationary benefits can lead to an understatement of taxable income and tax liability over time.
3. Potential Manipulation: LIFO can be subject to manipulation and abuse. Companies might be inclined to manipulate their inventory purchases or inventory layers to achieve more favorable tax outcomes, resulting in potential tax avoidance.
4. Conformity with Financial Reporting: The IRS requires that the chosen inventory valuation method for tax purposes must also be used consistently for financial reporting purposes. However, the use of LIFO may not conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or international financial reporting standards (IFRS), which may make it less desirable for some companies.
It's worth noting that LIFO is allowed for tax purposes in the United States, but it requires specific authorization from the IRS. Additionally, businesses that use LIFO must maintain detailed records and disclose the LIFO reserve, which represents the difference between inventory valued under LIFO and under FIFO, on their financial statements.
Ultimately, the IRS scrutinizes LIFO inventory valuation due to its potential complexity, inflationary effect, potential for manipulation, and potential non-conformity with financial reporting standards. This scrutiny ensures that businesses using LIFO adhere to the necessary requirements and maintain accurate and fair tax reporting.
In times of rising material costs, using the weighted average inventory costing method can impact the cost of sales and cash flow in the following ways:
Cost of Sales: The weighted average method calculates the cost of goods sold (COGS) by averaging the cost of all units in inventory, considering both the older and newer purchases. As a result, the cost of sales is influenced by the average cost of all units, including both the lower-cost inventory purchased earlier and the higher-cost inventory purchased more recently.
During periods of rising material costs, using the weighted average method can result in a moderate impact on the cost of sales. It may not fully capture the most recent higher material costs, as it blends them with the lower costs from previous inventory purchases. Consequently, the cost of sales may not accurately reflect the current market prices of materials.
Gross Profit: The impact on gross profit depends on the relationship between the average cost of inventory and the selling price. If the selling price can be increased to compensate for the higher material costs, the impact on gross profit may be minimized. However, if the selling price cannot be increased proportionally, the gross profit margin may be reduced.
Cash Flow: The weighted average method does not directly impact cash flow from operating activities. The cash flow statement reflects actual cash inflows and outflows, while the inventory costing method affects the calculation of COGS on the income statement. However, the weighted average method can indirectly impact cash flow if it affects the gross profit and net income figures, which can influence cash flows from financing or investing activities.
It's important to note that the impact of the weighted average method on cost of sales and cash flow may differ depending on the specific circumstances of the company, the timing of inventory purchases, and the nature of the industry. Therefore, it is advisable for businesses to carefully assess their inventory costing method and consult with accounting professionals to determine the most appropriate approach for their financial reporting and cash flow management.
Comments